2 Responses to “Asymmetrical Case-Marking”

1. Thomas Hart Chappell Says:
   February 23rd, 2010 at 11:39 pm

   http://wals.info/feature/combined?id1=28&id2=50
   also seems to show a few contradictions.
   Why is Hunzib listed as having no syncretism in feature 28, but as having syncretism in relevant NP types in feature 50?
   Why are Beja, Hamtai, Rama, and Squamish listed as having no or minimal inflectional case-marking in feature 28, but as having syncretism in relevant NP types in feature 50?

2. Thomas Hart Chappell Says:
   February 23rd, 2010 at 11:55 pm

   http://wals.info/feature/combined?id1=50&id2=51
   Why are Lavukaleve, Oneida, Zulu, and Swahili listed as having no morphological case-marking for feature 50 but case suffixes or case prefixes or mixed morphological case for feature 51?

Leave a Reply

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website