Datapoint for feature 105 and language wals_code_pny
Discuss WALS Datapoint for feature 105 and language wals_code_pny.
-
Recent Comments
- Emily on Datapoint Wichita / Absence of Common Consonants
- lexie on Datapoint Norwegian / Politeness Distinctions in Pronouns
- Nicholas Harlan Hancock on Datapoint for feature 54A and language wals_code_eng
- Alexander Elias on Datapoint Po-Ai / Consonant-Vowel Ratio
- Alexander Elias on Datapoint Po-Ai / Vowel Quality Inventories
Categories
Meta
Archives
- December 2019 (69)
- November 2019 (150)
- October 2019 (125)
- September 2019 (112)
- August 2019 (94)
- July 2019 (96)
- June 2019 (96)
- May 2019 (177)
- April 2019 (181)
- March 2019 (173)
- February 2019 (148)
- January 2019 (161)
- December 2018 (129)
- November 2018 (157)
- October 2018 (174)
- September 2018 (123)
- August 2018 (79)
- July 2018 (82)
- June 2018 (112)
- May 2018 (156)
- April 2018 (169)
- March 2018 (180)
- February 2018 (165)
- January 2018 (147)
- December 2017 (179)
- November 2017 (205)
- October 2017 (173)
- September 2017 (132)
- August 2017 (115)
- July 2017 (112)
- June 2017 (107)
- May 2017 (145)
- April 2017 (197)
- March 2017 (213)
- February 2017 (200)
- January 2017 (175)
- December 2016 (209)
- November 2016 (238)
- October 2016 (181)
- September 2016 (156)
- August 2016 (142)
- July 2016 (126)
- June 2016 (156)
- May 2016 (235)
- April 2016 (210)
- March 2016 (220)
- February 2016 (200)
- January 2016 (187)
- December 2015 (204)
- November 2015 (309)
- October 2015 (236)
- September 2015 (217)
- August 2015 (162)
- July 2015 (204)
- June 2015 (213)
- May 2015 (257)
- April 2015 (369)
- March 2015 (327)
- February 2015 (271)
- January 2015 (272)
- December 2014 (273)
- November 2014 (401)
- October 2014 (483)
- September 2014 (342)
- August 2014 (294)
- July 2014 (321)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (13)
- April 2014 (4)
- March 2014 (14)
- February 2014 (9)
- January 2014 (9)
- December 2013 (6)
- November 2013 (26)
- October 2013 (28)
- September 2013 (27)
- August 2013 (30)
- July 2013 (29)
- June 2013 (16)
- May 2013 (29)
- April 2013 (27)
- March 2013 (33)
- February 2013 (14)
- January 2013 (22)
- December 2012 (20)
- November 2012 (34)
- October 2012 (17)
- September 2012 (18)
- August 2012 (14)
- July 2012 (14)
- June 2012 (13)
- May 2012 (17)
- April 2012 (29)
- March 2012 (27)
- February 2012 (36)
- January 2012 (28)
- December 2011 (29)
- November 2011 (24)
- October 2011 (19)
- September 2011 (15)
- August 2011 (24)
- July 2011 (14)
- June 2011 (18)
- May 2011 (45)
- April 2011 (244)
- March 2011 (227)
- February 2011 (180)
- January 2011 (228)
- December 2010 (191)
- November 2010 (244)
- October 2010 (225)
- September 2010 (158)
- August 2010 (122)
- July 2010 (104)
- June 2010 (133)
- May 2010 (216)
- April 2010 (202)
- March 2010 (230)
- February 2010 (198)
- January 2010 (167)
- December 2009 (232)
- November 2009 (283)
- October 2009 (272)
- September 2009 (212)
- August 2009 (148)
- July 2009 (172)
- June 2009 (257)
- May 2009 (338)
- April 2009 (271)
- March 2009 (309)
- February 2009 (373)
- January 2009 (171)
- December 2008 (2)
- November 2008 (5)
- October 2008 (6)
- September 2008 (4)
- August 2008 (2)
- July 2008 (5)
- June 2008 (2)
- May 2008 (1)
- April 2008 (146)
- October 2007 (1)
December 4th, 2008 at 5:02 pm
The value given in WALS Online 2008 is not correct, see
http://blog.wals.info/value-assignment-error-in-chapter-105-for-panyjima/