The Past Tense
by Östen Dahl and Viveka Velupillai http://wals.info/feature/66
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, April 1st, 2008 at 12:00 pm by wals and is filed under Verbal Categories.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
June 30th, 2008 at 10:01 pm
Greetings. I could not help but noticing
that in feature 66, languages that have
2 and 3 past tense remoteness distinctions
are categorized together, and that those
that have 4 or more form another category;
Why not make different categories, then, for
languages with 2 and 3 remoteness distinctions?
(It does not make sense to me that 2 cases
have a category of their own, and yet that
the category inmediately next to that one is
so broad)
July 1st, 2008 at 11:29 am
This is certainly a possibility to consider. Probably the authors simply did not want to have too many values in the map.